After watching two nights of the Democratic National Convention, and a week after the RNC in Tampa, I've come to this conclusion: it's all about Personal Responsibility vs. OPM (Other People's Money).
The Republicans will tell you that there's a finite amount of money available to fund the government, therefore, we must be fiscally frugal, and share in the overall responsibility, especially those who benefit most from government dollars (a hand-up).
The Democrats, on the other hand, will tell you that debt is not an issue. The DNC is willing to throw money at every problem, no matter what the consequences (a hand-out), in order to garner the most votes.
Republicans believe that those who benefit from taxpayer money the most, should pay their fair share in return.
Sadly, 47% of all Americans are on some sort of government assistance. They tend to vote for whoever is best for them (i.e., whoever promises to give them the most free stuff).
Difficult economic decisions in areas like MediCare, Social Security, Military, etc., can't keep getting kicked down the road. We will drown in our own debt if we don't stand up and address the problem of overspending.
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Sunday, May 13, 2012
Back to the Future.
In a recent article in the NcR, John Allen describes the current situation of the LCWR, and what their future may hold. In one of the online comments, a writer describes the members of the LCWR as "the backbone of the Catholic denomination."
I would hardly call the nuns of the LCWR the "backbone of the Catholic denomination". That may have held true 50+ years ago, but that "backbone" is now pushing a median age of 80, and most of those wonderful Catholic schools that operated under the aegis of women religious are now closed, due (in part) to teaching sisters becoming extinct.
If these great communities of strong women would've stayed committed to their corporate apostolates, continued living in viable communities, placing the Mass and Divine Office at the center of their prayer lives, things may be different today.
Instead, the vast majority of women religious belonging to the LCWR have gone astray, deciding instead to focus on politically-charged, left-leaning agendas, and all but abandoning their original charism of educating Catholic youth.
They've abandoned traditional spirituality in exchange for New Age philosophies, including the enneagram and labyrinths. They have discarded their habits (a symbol of poverty and sign of their community to one another) for polyester pantsuits.
None of this was even remotely recommended by the Second Vatican Council. Maybe George and Sister Joan are right. The LCWR should disband as the canonically-recognized representative of women religious, and continue on their path of self-destruction.
As a vital part of Catholic America, the LCWR is dead. Long-live the CMSWR!
I would hardly call the nuns of the LCWR the "backbone of the Catholic denomination". That may have held true 50+ years ago, but that "backbone" is now pushing a median age of 80, and most of those wonderful Catholic schools that operated under the aegis of women religious are now closed, due (in part) to teaching sisters becoming extinct.
If these great communities of strong women would've stayed committed to their corporate apostolates, continued living in viable communities, placing the Mass and Divine Office at the center of their prayer lives, things may be different today.
Instead, the vast majority of women religious belonging to the LCWR have gone astray, deciding instead to focus on politically-charged, left-leaning agendas, and all but abandoning their original charism of educating Catholic youth.
They've abandoned traditional spirituality in exchange for New Age philosophies, including the enneagram and labyrinths. They have discarded their habits (a symbol of poverty and sign of their community to one another) for polyester pantsuits.
None of this was even remotely recommended by the Second Vatican Council. Maybe George and Sister Joan are right. The LCWR should disband as the canonically-recognized representative of women religious, and continue on their path of self-destruction.
As a vital part of Catholic America, the LCWR is dead. Long-live the CMSWR!
Thursday, May 10, 2012
5 Lies regarding the LCWR Doctrinal Assessment
Well, it's been one week since the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith released its 8-page Doctrinal Assessment of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR). Of course, the left is having it's usual spittle-flecked nutty over the whole thing.
Sadly, many of the typically level-headed reports are falling prey to some of the blather coming from the progressive wing of the Church. The top 5 errors (or lies, depending on your viewpoint) go something like this:
1. The evil bishops (men) are just trying to push around the nuns (women) and silence them.
It's not about men vs. women. The bishops are the true Magisterium of the Church. They teach the faith in an authoritative manner. This is doctrine. While other men (and women) can collaborate with the bishops, they have the final say.
2. It's all about the LCWR supporting "Obamacare", much to the chagrin of the US bishops.
The Doctrinal Assessment followed a Visitation of ALL women religious in the United States, not just the members of the LCWR. This Visitation was announced in 2008, while George W. Bush was still President. That being said, it wouldn't surprise me if those involved in the Visitation to into account the recent comments by members of the LCWR over and against the US bishops, creating their own "Magisterium of Nuns", and diminishing the bishops' authentic role as shepherds of the Church.
3. The LCWR is too busy with it's "social justice" agenda to focus on the pro-life mission of the Church.
Not only have the sisters of the LCWR lost their focus regarding abortion, contraception, etc., they actively OPPOSE the bishops and Church doctrine. Nuns have even worked FOR abortion clinics! A member of the Sisters of Providence in Terre Haute, IN, even commented that she gives out condoms at the health care clinic she works at.
4. The Church is misogynistic in it's view of women and the priesthood.
The members of the LCWR still think that the issue of women's ordination is up for discussion. Blessed Pope John Paul II ended all discussion, when he stated that it is a difinitive teaching of the Church that only men can be ordained ot the priesthood.
5. The bishops are meddling in the sisters' spirituality.
Spirituality that is based on enneagrams, labyrinths, and other New Age beliefs. You will be hard-pressed to find a conference sponsored by the LCWR that doesn't involved at least one of these. Absent from their "spirituality" is any link to the official worship of the Church: The Mass and the Liturgy of the Hours.
Also absent from these meetings are traditional spiritual prayers, such as the Rosary, Stations of the Cross, Divine Mercy Chaplet, Ignatian Exercises, etc.
Sadly, many of the typically level-headed reports are falling prey to some of the blather coming from the progressive wing of the Church. The top 5 errors (or lies, depending on your viewpoint) go something like this:
1. The evil bishops (men) are just trying to push around the nuns (women) and silence them.
It's not about men vs. women. The bishops are the true Magisterium of the Church. They teach the faith in an authoritative manner. This is doctrine. While other men (and women) can collaborate with the bishops, they have the final say.
2. It's all about the LCWR supporting "Obamacare", much to the chagrin of the US bishops.
The Doctrinal Assessment followed a Visitation of ALL women religious in the United States, not just the members of the LCWR. This Visitation was announced in 2008, while George W. Bush was still President. That being said, it wouldn't surprise me if those involved in the Visitation to into account the recent comments by members of the LCWR over and against the US bishops, creating their own "Magisterium of Nuns", and diminishing the bishops' authentic role as shepherds of the Church.
3. The LCWR is too busy with it's "social justice" agenda to focus on the pro-life mission of the Church.
Not only have the sisters of the LCWR lost their focus regarding abortion, contraception, etc., they actively OPPOSE the bishops and Church doctrine. Nuns have even worked FOR abortion clinics! A member of the Sisters of Providence in Terre Haute, IN, even commented that she gives out condoms at the health care clinic she works at.
4. The Church is misogynistic in it's view of women and the priesthood.
The members of the LCWR still think that the issue of women's ordination is up for discussion. Blessed Pope John Paul II ended all discussion, when he stated that it is a difinitive teaching of the Church that only men can be ordained ot the priesthood.
5. The bishops are meddling in the sisters' spirituality.
Spirituality that is based on enneagrams, labyrinths, and other New Age beliefs. You will be hard-pressed to find a conference sponsored by the LCWR that doesn't involved at least one of these. Absent from their "spirituality" is any link to the official worship of the Church: The Mass and the Liturgy of the Hours.
Also absent from these meetings are traditional spiritual prayers, such as the Rosary, Stations of the Cross, Divine Mercy Chaplet, Ignatian Exercises, etc.
Misplaced accusations of misogyny
During this whole kerfuffle regarding the recently-announced results of the doctrinal assessment conducted on the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, we've heard numerous claims that this was a "misogynistic attack" on women. The loudest complainers then run off a list of all the good things that the women religious of the LCWR have done in the past.
Of course, this just deflects from the real issues of heresy and illicit/invalid liturgical celebrations that are part and parcel of many LCWR-sponsored events.
But was is routinely overlooked, is the fact that the Holy See ordered a visitation of all U.S. seminaries in 2005, similar to the visitation of the LCWR and CMSWR in 2009-2011. Lest we forget, the seminaries are ALL-MALE.
I don't remember hearing all the whining, screeching, etc. during the seminary visitation, or claims that the Holy See "hates men."
Of course, this just deflects from the real issues of heresy and illicit/invalid liturgical celebrations that are part and parcel of many LCWR-sponsored events.
But was is routinely overlooked, is the fact that the Holy See ordered a visitation of all U.S. seminaries in 2005, similar to the visitation of the LCWR and CMSWR in 2009-2011. Lest we forget, the seminaries are ALL-MALE.
I don't remember hearing all the whining, screeching, etc. during the seminary visitation, or claims that the Holy See "hates men."
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
The beginning of the end?
Word has come out that the Doctrinal Assessment of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious has come to an end. The results of the assessment are devastating for the LCWR.
As posted by Rocco Palmo:
The eight-page summary written by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is pretty straightforward. In part, it gives the LWCR cudos for "a great deal of work on the part of LCWR promoting issues of social justice in harmony with the Church’s social doctrine".
Nonetheless, "it is silent on the right to life from conception to natural death, a question that is part of the lively public debate about abortion and euthanasia in the United States."
The LWCR is silent because it doesn't believe, for the most part, in any type of "right to life" as the Church defines it. Many sisters in the LWCR are vocal proponents of abortion and/or artificial birth control. Sister Barbara Battista, SP, is one of those sisters of dissent.
Hopefully, real change is in store. If not, we may see the wholesale collapse of the LCWR. Maybe their charter will be revoked, and the Council of Major Superiors of Women Religious (CMSWR) will be the sole representative for women religious in the United States.
The congregations that are part of the CMSWR are traditional, young....and growing. Compare photos of members of the CWSWR to those of the LCWR.
This is a photo of LCWR members from the Sisters of Providence:
Below, a photo of the Dominican Sisters of Mary, Mother of the Eucharist:
As posted by Rocco Palmo:
Citing "serious doctrinal problems" found over the course of a four-year study of the umbrella-group representing the majority of the US' communities of nuns, the Holy See has announced a thoroughgoing shake-up of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR), naming Archbishop Peter Sartain of Seattle as its delegate to conduct an overhaul of the group.
Among other concerns raised in an eight-page summary of the doctrinal inquest released today, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith cited addresses at LCWR conferences that, it said, manifested a "rejection of faith," protests of church teaching on homosexuality and the ordination of women by officers of the group, and a "prevalence of certain radical feminist themes incompatible with the Catholic faith" in some of the conference's events.
"The current doctrinal and pastoral situation of the LCWR is grave and a matter of serious concern," the dicastery said.
The eight-page summary written by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is pretty straightforward. In part, it gives the LWCR cudos for "a great deal of work on the part of LCWR promoting issues of social justice in harmony with the Church’s social doctrine".
Nonetheless, "it is silent on the right to life from conception to natural death, a question that is part of the lively public debate about abortion and euthanasia in the United States."
The LWCR is silent because it doesn't believe, for the most part, in any type of "right to life" as the Church defines it. Many sisters in the LWCR are vocal proponents of abortion and/or artificial birth control. Sister Barbara Battista, SP, is one of those sisters of dissent.
Hopefully, real change is in store. If not, we may see the wholesale collapse of the LCWR. Maybe their charter will be revoked, and the Council of Major Superiors of Women Religious (CMSWR) will be the sole representative for women religious in the United States.
The congregations that are part of the CMSWR are traditional, young....and growing. Compare photos of members of the CWSWR to those of the LCWR.
This is a photo of LCWR members from the Sisters of Providence:
 |
| Shown are the Sisters of Providence 2010 general officers, from left, Sister Dawn Tomaszewski, Sister Jeneen Howard, Sister Mary Beth Klingel, Sister Lisa Stallings and Sister Denise Wilkinson, who was re-elected general superior |
Below, a photo of the Dominican Sisters of Mary, Mother of the Eucharist:
 |
| The average age: 28. |
Saturday, April 14, 2012
The many faces of Sister Battista
In our last post, we discussed how the dissenting views of a local religious sister were brought to the public eye in a weekly Indianapolis Star political column by Dan Carpenter. Mr. Carpenter brings up an email conversation he had with Sister Barbara Battista, SP, regarding the views of artificial contraception by the U.S. bishops.
After doing some digging (which didn't take much work, actually), it was discovered that Sister Barbara is no newcomer to the protest scene.
Sister Barbara has been protesting at the School Of America's (SOA) at Ft. Benning, for years, and appears to be a proud suporter of SOA Watch, a human rights group founded by former Maryknoll priest, Roy Bourgeois.
Fr. Bourgeois is a proud (I would say infamous) dissenter in his own right. He was excommunicated in November, 2008, for participating in a mock ordination of women to the priesthood a moth earlier. He has refused to recant his support for women's ordination. According to Wiki, the Vatican is currently considering Fr. Bourgeois removal from the priesthood.
Photos of Sister Battista and Fr. Bourgeois at this protest rally can be viewed here. I cannot post them due to copyright issues.
Sister Battista's public Twitter account shows a recent (Jan. 19, 2012) post asking readers to click on a link to a NARAL site. "Get the shocking facts on the 2011 War on Women from NARAL's infographic.", she shouts with glee.
Once on that site, NARAL asks "If you think that it's wrong for politicians to interfere in women's personal, private, medical decisions, please share this infographic with your friends." It then urges the reader to "post it on your Facebook wall, Tweet it, and email it far and wide."
Like the good foot-soldier of death that she is, Sister Barbara heeds their call.
For those of you who don't know, NARAL Pro-Choice America (formerly National Abortion Rights Action League) is is an organization in the U.S. that engages in political action to oppose restrictions on abortion, and expand access to abortion. NARAL uses numerous tactics to lobby for liberalized access to abortion.
After doing some digging (which didn't take much work, actually), it was discovered that Sister Barbara is no newcomer to the protest scene.
Sister Barbara has been protesting at the School Of America's (SOA) at Ft. Benning, for years, and appears to be a proud suporter of SOA Watch, a human rights group founded by former Maryknoll priest, Roy Bourgeois.
Fr. Bourgeois is a proud (I would say infamous) dissenter in his own right. He was excommunicated in November, 2008, for participating in a mock ordination of women to the priesthood a moth earlier. He has refused to recant his support for women's ordination. According to Wiki, the Vatican is currently considering Fr. Bourgeois removal from the priesthood.
Photos of Sister Battista and Fr. Bourgeois at this protest rally can be viewed here. I cannot post them due to copyright issues.
Sister Battista's public Twitter account shows a recent (Jan. 19, 2012) post asking readers to click on a link to a NARAL site. "Get the shocking facts on the 2011 War on Women from NARAL's infographic.", she shouts with glee.
Once on that site, NARAL asks "If you think that it's wrong for politicians to interfere in women's personal, private, medical decisions, please share this infographic with your friends." It then urges the reader to "post it on your Facebook wall, Tweet it, and email it far and wide."
Like the good foot-soldier of death that she is, Sister Barbara heeds their call.
For those of you who don't know, NARAL Pro-Choice America (formerly National Abortion Rights Action League) is is an organization in the U.S. that engages in political action to oppose restrictions on abortion, and expand access to abortion. NARAL uses numerous tactics to lobby for liberalized access to abortion.
Sister Barbara Battista, SP: The face of dissent.
Recently, The Indianapolis Star published a weekly column by the far-left progressive, Dan Carpenter. It can be read here in it's entirety. The article took the USCCB to task for revoking a grant to help ex-cons transition back into society. When the CCHD found out that this corporation was distributing condoms to the ex-cons, they stopped paying the company.
In this article, Mr. Carpenter described an email he received from Sister Barbara Battista, SP (Sisters of Providence). In it, Sister Battista takes the U.S. bishops to task for their stance on birth control (i.e. condoms).
"Please, let's ask the Hoosiers, not our bishops, what we want RecycleForce to do," she said by email."I bet that condom bowl will be put back out! I am a health-care provider gratefully working in a public facility.We happily have free condoms in our exam rooms."
Sister Battista is not just your run-of-the-mill liberal nun. She is president of the Indiana Academy of Physician Assistants!
She's also very active in the peace movement, having protested at the former School of Americas (SOA) in Fort Benning, Georgia.
Just so we don't misrepresent her position on artificial contraception, maybe we should go to her public Twitter account, and see if we can gleen her thoughts on the matter.
Amazingly (or not so amazingly), barb1840 (Sister Barbara) is an ardent follower of the following pro-abortion groups:
ChoiceUSA: Their website claims that "[a]s a national pro-choice organization, Choice USA gives emerging leaders the tools they need to organize, network, and exchange ideas to build a youth centered pro-choice agenda and mobilize communities for reproductive justice." Co-founded by Gloria Steinem.
Not Under The Bus: A project arm of the Women's Media Center (WMC). actively advocates to keep abortion legal. WMC was founded in 2005 as a non-profit progressive women's media organization by Jane Fonda, Robin Morgan, and Gloria Steinem.
National Women's Law Center: Founded in 1972. According to their website, one of it's primary missions is "to ensure that women have access to abortion care by protecting and advancing this fundamental right."
SisterSong -Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective: Founded in 1997 with a mission "to amplify and strengthen the collective voices of Indigenous women and women of color to ensure reproductive justice through securing human rights." The national coordinator is Loretta Ross. Last year's national conference posted it's own weblogs called "blogforchoice" and "ChicagoAbortionFund".
Catholics For Choice: A radical dissenting group of marginal Catholics who support legalized abortion. There website says - in part: "Catholics for Choice believes in a world where everyone has equal access to the full range of reproductive healthcare services—including access to safe and legal abortion services and affordable and reliable forms of contraception. "
This is not just sad. It's disgusting. How can a catholic nun, who is apparently in good-standing with her order, promote views and beliefs so out-of-touch with definitive teaching of the Church?
But Sister Battista isn't alone in her dissent. In my next post, I'll travel a little deeper into the murky waters of dissent within the progressive wing of women religous. We will discuss the deep, pervasive progressivism and dissent within the Sisters of Providence, as well as within the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR).
Friday, March 2, 2012
Myths abound about HHS contraceptive mandate; here are the facts
WASHINGTON (CNS) -- Exaggerations and outright misrepresentations about the
Department of Health and Human Services' contraceptive mandate have been
appearing in White House "fact sheets" and mainstream media. Here are some of
the more frequently cited claims and the facts to counter them:
Myth:
Self-insurance is a seldom-used method of providing health insurance to
employers, used mainly by church organizations to avoid having to pay for
abortions or birth control.
Fact: A majority of Americans who have private health insurance are in self-insured plans, according to separate reports by the Congressional Research Service and the Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research & Educational Trust. The percentage was 44 percent in 1999, 55 percent in 2008 and had increased to 60 percent by 2011. Employees in large
companies (those with 200 or more employees) were even more likely to be covered
by a self-insured plan. Eighty-two percent of workers at large firms -- and 96
percent of those who work for a company with 5,000 or more workers -- were in a
self-insured health plan. There is no precise count of how many of the employees
working for Catholic organizations or institutions are in self-insured plans,
but the number is believed to mirror that of the general population.
Myth:
Twenty-eight states already require employers to cover contraceptives for their
employees, so the situation in those states will not change.
Fact:
Self-insured plans are excluded from state contraceptive mandates, but not from federal
requirements. In addition, all but three states -- California, New York and
Oregon -- include a broader religious exemption than the HHS one, which sets
four criteria for an exemption: that an employer's purpose is to inculcate
religious values, that it primarily hires and serves people who share its
religious tenets, and that it is a nonprofit organization under certain sections
of the tax code.
Department of Health and Human Services' contraceptive mandate have been
appearing in White House "fact sheets" and mainstream media. Here are some of
the more frequently cited claims and the facts to counter them:
Myth:
Self-insurance is a seldom-used method of providing health insurance to
employers, used mainly by church organizations to avoid having to pay for
abortions or birth control.
Fact: A majority of Americans who have private health insurance are in self-insured plans, according to separate reports by the Congressional Research Service and the Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research & Educational Trust. The percentage was 44 percent in 1999, 55 percent in 2008 and had increased to 60 percent by 2011. Employees in large
companies (those with 200 or more employees) were even more likely to be covered
by a self-insured plan. Eighty-two percent of workers at large firms -- and 96
percent of those who work for a company with 5,000 or more workers -- were in a
self-insured health plan. There is no precise count of how many of the employees
working for Catholic organizations or institutions are in self-insured plans,
but the number is believed to mirror that of the general population.
Myth:
Twenty-eight states already require employers to cover contraceptives for their
employees, so the situation in those states will not change.
Fact:
Self-insured plans are excluded from state contraceptive mandates, but not from federal
requirements. In addition, all but three states -- California, New York and
Oregon -- include a broader religious exemption than the HHS one, which sets
four criteria for an exemption: that an employer's purpose is to inculcate
religious values, that it primarily hires and serves people who share its
religious tenets, and that it is a nonprofit organization under certain sections
of the tax code.
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Newborns no longer considered human??? My God...
This story just stuns me.
According to today's London Telegraph, medical ethicists from Oxford University - in an article published in the Journal of Medical Ethics - have stated that "[p]arents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are “morally irrelevant” and ending their lives is no different to abortion."
I'm not making this up. Really. It goes on to say:
Did you get that? They consider newborn babies as "potential persons." Instead of calling it what it is - infanticide (murder) - they use the colloquial term, "after-birth abortion." Wow.
"To claim the right to abortion, infanticide and
euthanasia, and to recognize that right in law, means to attribute to human
freedom a perverse and evil significance: that of an absolute power over others
and against others. This is the death of true freedom: "Truly, truly, I say to
you, every one who commits sin is a slave to sin" (Jn 8:34)." - Evangelium Vitae, 20.
According to today's London Telegraph, medical ethicists from Oxford University - in an article published in the Journal of Medical Ethics - have stated that "[p]arents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are “morally irrelevant” and ending their lives is no different to abortion."
I'm not making this up. Really. It goes on to say:
“The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a
fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the
attribution of a right to life to an individual.
”Rather than being “actual persons”, newborns were “potential persons”.
They explained: “Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human
beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense
of ‘subject of a moral right to life’.
Did you get that? They consider newborn babies as "potential persons." Instead of calling it what it is - infanticide (murder) - they use the colloquial term, "after-birth abortion." Wow.
"To claim the right to abortion, infanticide and
euthanasia, and to recognize that right in law, means to attribute to human
freedom a perverse and evil significance: that of an absolute power over others
and against others. This is the death of true freedom: "Truly, truly, I say to
you, every one who commits sin is a slave to sin" (Jn 8:34)." - Evangelium Vitae, 20.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
The War on Catholicism Continues...
In Sunday's edition of The Star Press, there was an article by George Wolfe regarding "violence", and how the definition should be expanded to include " organizations that restrict the rights of women", which include "religious institutions where women cannot attain the same economic, educational and leadership opportunities available to men." [emphasis added]
Mr. Wolfe's personal expanded definition of "violence" would cover just about every instance where a person gets his/her feelings hurt. By labeling everyone a "victim" it lessens the impact that true violence has on people.
Mr. Wolfe sees victimizers behind every door, especially if they are Christians, or more specifically, Catholics.
As shown in Wolfe's thesis above, women are being victimized daily by the reluctance of the Catholic Church to allow women to become priests and bishops, thus denying them their rightful positions of authority.
You see, it's a power thing for Mr. Wolfe - have's vs. have not's. As all well-informed Catholics know, women cannot be ordained to the priesthood anymore than men can bear children.
Wolfe's worldview explains why so many poor and hungry Americans are slaves to entitlement programs. This is the true violence.
True violence is when children can be aborted and treated as just a "choice". True violence is when Christians are forced to cover birth control costs, contrary to their moral convictions.
Mr. Wolfe should go back to playing his sax.
Mr. Wolfe's personal expanded definition of "violence" would cover just about every instance where a person gets his/her feelings hurt. By labeling everyone a "victim" it lessens the impact that true violence has on people.
Mr. Wolfe sees victimizers behind every door, especially if they are Christians, or more specifically, Catholics.
As shown in Wolfe's thesis above, women are being victimized daily by the reluctance of the Catholic Church to allow women to become priests and bishops, thus denying them their rightful positions of authority.
You see, it's a power thing for Mr. Wolfe - have's vs. have not's. As all well-informed Catholics know, women cannot be ordained to the priesthood anymore than men can bear children.
Wolfe's worldview explains why so many poor and hungry Americans are slaves to entitlement programs. This is the true violence.
True violence is when children can be aborted and treated as just a "choice". True violence is when Christians are forced to cover birth control costs, contrary to their moral convictions.
Mr. Wolfe should go back to playing his sax.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)